Date of Award

2008

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Education

Abstract

Several high-profile, multiple-victim school shootings between 1996 and 1999 dramatically shook the public's perception of the safety of our schools. In response to public concern, the Dallas Independent School District (DISD) developed a district-wide policy for responding to threats of violence and implemented the Dallas Threat of Violence Risk Assessment (DTVRA). The DTVRA is designed to help school personnel assess the likelihood of a student following through with a threat and to provide guidance for appropriate interventions for students who threaten violence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability and construct-related validity of the DTVRA. Ratings from 35 newly-hired school counselors on four fictional case scenarios were used. Ratings from 5 pairs of counselors yielded 17 out of 20 statistically significant correlations, and average percent agreement on individual items was relatively high across the case scenarios. A complex case rated high-risk due to the presence of several high-risk behaviors was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement of attack-related behaviors. Analysis of ratings on this case scenario showed mixed results. In support of the instrument's content-related validity, results showed that raters were able to differentiate between low-, medium-, and high-risk cases using the DTVRA. Limitations of this study and implications for practice are discussed.

Share

COinS